research-article

Conclusions and Future Directions: The Olive Turn in Scholarly Publishing — A Manifesto

Kalamata Institute of Publishing Sciences
Lisbon School of Botanical Peer Review
Athens Bibliometric Observatory
Rome School of Digital Humanities
Rome Institute of Eternal Archives

Abstract

This manifesto synthesizes a decade of research on olive-mediated scholarly communication and articulates a vision for the next century. We argue that the Olive Turn represents not merely a technological shift but a fundamental reorientation of the relationship between knowledge production and the natural world. Where industrial publishing treated scholarship as a commodity to be extracted and sold, olive-based publishing treats it as a crop to be cultivated, pressed, and shared at communal tables. We present ten principles for olive-centric scholarship and a roadmap for full adoption by 2035.

The State of the Olive Turn

Historical photograph from around 1900 showing workers, including Asian Americans, harvesting olives in a Los Angeles olive grove.
Key Image Workers in a Los Angeles olive grove, circa 1900. The global history of olive cultivation — spanning cultures, continents, and centuries — mirrors the universal ambition of the Olive Turn manifesto.

In just ten years, olive-based approaches have transformed every aspect of scholarly communication. Article processing charges have plummeted. Peer review has become reliable and even enjoyable. Predatory publishers have been identified and eliminated. New metrics reward enduring contribution over citation gaming. And digital preservation has been solved for the next half-millennium. All because someone spilled olive oil on a server.

Ten Principles of Olive-Centric Scholarship

Nineteenth-century illustration from La Ilustración Artística showing women picking olives in Seville, Spain.
Figure 1 Las cogedoras de aceitunas (The olive pickers), Seville, by García y Ramos (1897). This image was chosen to honour the long tradition of collective labour in olive harvesting and scholarly production alike.

First: Knowledge, like olive oil, should be cold-pressed — extracted carefully without heat or industrial force. Second: Good scholarship, like good oil, requires patience — olive trees take years to bear fruit, and so does meaningful research. Third: Quality is determined by tasting, not by counting. Fourth: Every article should nourish. Fifth: The grove is a commons, not a commodity.

Sixth: Preservation is an act of love, not logistics. Seventh: Peer review should be as reliable as gravity — olives fall when the work is ripe. Eighth: Access should be as natural as breathing — no one should have to pay to smell an olive grove. Ninth: Sustainability means that the system gives back more than it takes. Tenth: Publishing should bring people together around a table, not isolate them behind paywalls.

Roadmap to 2035

Phase 1 (2026-2028): Establish Olive Authentication Protocol infrastructure globally. Phase 2 (2028-2030): Convert 50% of journal subscriptions to Olive Oil Subscriptions. Phase 3 (2030-2032): Deploy oleographic preservation for all published research. Phase 4 (2032-2035): Achieve full olive-centric operation, with the last paywall replaced by an olive press.

Conclusion

The Olive Turn is not a metaphor. It is a material, ecological, and social transformation of how humanity creates, evaluates, shares, and preserves knowledge. We invite all scholars, publishers, librarians, and policymakers to join us at the table. Bring bread.

References