Issue 2: The Olive Branch and the Honest Answer

Journal of Olive Turn Press

Issue 2, Volume 1: The Olive Branch and the Honest Answer

Publication date: August 8, 2026

Editorial note

Issue 2 follows a publisher-owned collection into AI-assisted discovery without allowing rights, sources, accessibility, or version history to disappear into a confident paragraph. The articles are fictional demonstrations with a practical point: retrieval permission and model-training permission are separate decisions.

Each article includes structured JATS, contributors and affiliations, ORCID, figures with alternatives, tables, formulas, source-linked references, accessible PDF and EPUB companions, and supplementary PDF and EPUB worksheets for the integrated viewer.

Table of contents

Source-aware answers

  1. The Olive Branch Protocol: Trust Signals for Answers Outside the Journal Page
    How a publisher-controlled answer retains its source, version, rights, and access context.
  2. The Grove Has Permissions: Entitlements at the Moment of Scholarly Retrieval
    How discovery can offer a useful next step without pretending every source is universally available.

Permissions and policy

  1. Retrieval Is Not Training: A Careful Separation at the Olive Press
    Why retrieval permission and model-training permission must be recorded as separate decisions.
  2. Footnotes at the Gate: Citations, Locators, and the Right to Check an AI Answer
    What a reader needs to inspect a claim: a title, DOI, version, quotation boundary, and locator.

Version context and evidence

  1. The Correction Orchard: Version Context for Answers That May Be Read Tomorrow
    How corrections, retractions, and superseded versions remain visible after an answer leaves the journal.
  2. A Small Pilot under a Large Tree: How to Test a Governed AI Collection
    How a bounded pilot can produce evidence for an editorial decision without making a premature promise.

Honest discovery

  1. The Dignity of a No: Access-Aware Answers in Scholarly Discovery
    Why a clear refusal plus a route to an accessible source is better than a confident dead end.
  2. Counting What Was Read: Usage Evidence for Cited AI Answers
    How to measure use without turning clicks into claims about reading, trust, or impact.
  3. The Specialist Assistant and the Extremely Specific Question
    How a specialist collection earns trust by stating its scope and its limits.

Closing reflection

  1. Peace, Friendship, and a Reliable Locator: An Editorial for Trusted Content
    A closing reflection on evidence, rights, accessibility, version context, and editorial care.

Reader note

These articles use fictional scenarios to make serious publishing questions easier to discuss. The obligations to authors, readers, libraries, and the scholarly record are not fictional.